Apologies for another weekly summary. The weather's still nice, the World Cup is still on (some of us have teams who are still in the competition), and the son is home beginning a year-long internship in the UK, so blogs have taken a backseat for awhile.
Anyway, for the second week running, we've had a gaggle of good episodes. Whereas last week featured Sharon, or rather DTC's muse of scrotes, Shirley acting out, this week featured her even more, and she should be having an epiphany about Phil, but her wrinkled, old booze-flattened, cigarette-stinking skin is too thick and her entitlement is too great for her to even fathom that.
Secrets and Lies: The Ice Queen Goeth.
For the record, pregnant or not, I still think Ronnie killed Lucy. I still think Not-Charlie Cotton had something to do with it as well.
Let me also say, as well, that, since the Carters figured heavily in this week's episodes, I've never seen a more immature lot of adults in my life. The Mitchells are certainly dysfunctional, as are the Beales and the Brannings; but the Carters occupy an unusual situation, wherein the children of the family are, at times, more mature than their adult counterparts. There's a reason for this.
Shirley is certainly exemplary of such puerility. Her reaction to Phil's engagement to Sharon is to get stonking drunk, spend a night on a bench and then whine pathetically to - of all people - Roxy and Ronnie, the Retcon Sisters.
In fact, Ronnie ...
... goes so far to comfort Shirley by remarking that she'd always thought Shirley and Phil would end up together.
Really, Roswell?
Of course, Ronnie would think that Shirley was "the one" for Phil, for obvious reasons, and that remark and it's non-history (for lack of a better term) was the only niggle of this episode. Why? Because Ronnie Retcon would only have known Phil in a relationship with Shirley, but then before anyone starts jumping up and down about the use of the word retcon, the Mitchell sisters are. For years, prior to 2007, it was an established fact that Eric, Phil's father, had one brother, Clive. There was no mention ever of another brother or any cousins, other than Billy, whose father was Eric's first cousin. Billy bears the same relation to Phil that Michael Moon bore to Alfie.
Then, suddenly, we're presented with two Mitchell sisters, daughters of a Mitchell uncle, Archie, of whom we'd never heard, arrive at a non-wedding where they're not immediately recognised at all. They made, from time to time, vague references to incidences that happened when they were small children and the Bruvs were ages older, but they don't seem to be familiar any of the Mitchell lore that would have been common knowledge in a family like that -such as Sharongate. That was and certainly would have been big potatoes amongst the Mitchells.
Ronnie thought Shirley suited Phil the best? She may not have approved of Sharon because of the Sharongate saga, but surely she knows about Kathy? Kate?
Besides, how can she surmise that Shirley and Phil were the ultimate couple when Shirley encouraged and brought out the absolute worst in Phil? But then, Ronnie, at this point, is beyond redemption, herself.
However, in the course of this grand whine of poor pitiful Shirley's, she accidentally on purpose lets drop to Ronnie that Phil doesn't love Sharon. No, he doesn't, reckons Shirley. Shirley is absolutely certain that Phil doesn't love Sharon. In fact, he's only marrying her because he feels sorry for her ... because Phil organised the thugs to go into The Albert and beat Sharon up.
Well, no, actually, he didn't. But what's the truth to a scrote like Shirley? What Phil did was what the Mitchells always do. They organise a bit of terror tactic, with someone on hand to save the day, and then it goes wrong. The thugs were meant to scare Sharon and she was meant to be rescued by the bouncers she'd sent home. Phil never intended for Sharon to be physically hurt; things just got out of hand. It goes without saying, however, that what he meant to do originally, is just as despicable and psychologically intimidating.
Kudos to Ronnie for later pointing that out to Phil, that his male ego, his Mitchell ego was so much that he had to reduce an independent woman to a blubbing, gibbering wreck. Phil has known Sharon for twenty years. He should know her better, and for all scrote-faced Shirley boasts about knowing Phil better than anyone after a mere seven years of skulking around in his shadow, encouraging him to do bad, she should know better as well.
So now the headcount of who knows Phil's secret stands at Phil, Shirley and Ronnie. I'll bet, after she banged on his door, with Sharon upstairs, shoutiing the odds, that Phil regrets ever confiding in her.
Of couse, all this action in Monday's episode was played out against the revelation that Ronnie Retcon is pregnant. Again.
The fanbois are creaming their briefs over this one, jumping up and down agog and insisting that Ronnie is going to get a happy ending, with the baby she wants and with Charlie Cotton.
Guys, grow up. And get some balls. Seriously.
Ronnie is a psychopath. She's killed a man. She's probably killed Lucy. With the gun she so conveniently left at Phil's. Of course, she didn't shoot Lucy. There's more than one way you can kill with a gun. And Charlie Cotton isn't Charlie Cotton. In fact, we don't know who he is. But she is not going to get a happy ending, not by a long shot. In fact, I've revised my opinion that Ronnie might die. Having her die in childbirth would be one massive cop-out. She's killed a man, and if she killed Lucy, she'll be locked up for life - not five years or five months. This will be the storyline to illustrate the current law that's in force for murderers where life does actually mean life. So Ronnie probably will have a baby, but won't be able to be with that child because she'll be in prison.
And by the way, fanbois, it is possible to have sex, conceive a child and kill a person all in a night's work. I never knew there were so many virgins, especially male fanboi virgins, in the whole of the UK who now reckon that just because Ronnie and Charlie copulated on Good Friday, releases her as a suspect in Lucy's death. It doesn't. Her lack of presence enhances the suspicion.
Now stop wanking and go find a boy or girl to help you pop that cherry.
There were certainly a plethora of home truths tonight, none the least being that neither Phil nor Ronnie know what love is. I've no doubt that Phil loves Sharon, but he knows that Sharon not only knows his history, she's a part of it. She was the one he blamed, conveniently, for Sharongate. He stood by whilst his brother called her a whore, offered her about to his friends; he would be aware that Sharon knows the Mitchell form for proving a point and for insisting that they be the centre of the universe for every woman with whom they have a relationship. Sooner or later, Sharon's going to suss what Phil did, and it may not take Shirley to tell her. He also knows, deep down, that whilst he may love her, Sharon isn't in love with him. She's fond of him, but just let Grant pay a visit to Walford, and we'll see whom Sharon really loves.
The Mitchells really are toxic, especially so, without Peggy about to anchor them, and I was glad Phil refused to let Ronnie take the moral high ground, because she's done far worse, in cold-blooded murder, than Phil. Really, both of them need a comeuppance.
And please don't delude yourself about Ronnie's departure. She's not gone for good - in fact, she'll be back at the end of the summer, when the actress has finished filming Pleasant Valley. Ronnie just can't keep away from her control fetish and sexual obsession - Roxy - so she'll come back. What you saw on Monday was a psychopath losing her all-important control and retreating in order to regain it.
As for Shirley, how self-obsessed and pathetic! Who is she to know whom Phil loves and whom he doesn't? She's basing a lot of her assumptions on kindness and concern that he showed her after her declaration of love. She thinks that no one would put someone they love in harm's way the way Phil did Sharon? Then she doesn't know the Mitchells. No one loved Sharon more than Grant, yet he almost had her burned alive. Shirley loves the power Phil gives her by validating her as an important person in Walford. Without Phil, Shirley's just a drunk on a bench. Dean certainly knows. The best scene by far tonight was when Phil turned the tables on the old scrote and gave her a taste of her own blackmailing methods. She's got the secret about Phil and the Albert, but Phil knows that Mick is her son. And Sharon knows about Phil's and Shirley's involvement in covering Ronnie's murderous tracks.
Poor, self-pitying Shirl! Hits the bottle when things don't go her way. What a vile and disgusting character.
So Phil turns tricks on Shirley and demands her repayment of his loan of 10K or else, he'll tell her perfect Mick the truth about himself. Good to know that Shirl can dish it out, but she can't take it.
As for Sharon finding the gun, the woman is thinking.
Mr Pleasant, AKA Mick Carter.
Notice the coldness that now exists between Mick and Linda, as well as Mick's ill-concealed jealousy of Dean? Johnny's failed some of his exams. Are we surprised? Linda is quick to blame his tutors and everything else, but in the end, Johnny's right. He's only got himself to blame. He seemed to be spending a lot of hours working at the Vic, socialising with the local youngsters, having illegal parties at the Albert etc, and we rarely saw him studying or even referencing uni. This is pretty realistic, I would think. I hope he does re-sits and carries on, because further education doesn't sit high on EastEnders' scale of things. At least, not since Michelle Fowler got her degree.
It seems that everyone is taking an emotional punch at Linda, who can do nothing right - whether it's pampering her children or masking her disappointment that her child failed his exams. Mick is treating her now like a bastard at a family reunion, but Dean is very subtle in being nice to her.
Johnny, himself, annoyed me to no end in this episode, because as much as he might bleat on about wanting to grow up, when it suits him, he wants to be babied and mollycoddled by his mother. After all, Johnny readily admitted that he didn't go into halls his first year, because he wanted to live with his parents. In fact, for a university student, he spends curiously little time at uni. He doesn't participate in any fora or activities there, he has no friends. All his studying is done in the upstairs kitchen or at the bar or in the pub, itself. Are we suprised that he failed? Does he miss his parents so much he couldn't avail himself of the university library?
One final comment before I move to Tuesday's episode: Without a shadow of a doubt, Phil refused to take the gun Ronnie had. There's an ongoing discussion about this, wherein one participant refuses to yield to the obvious and admit a proven fact: Phil Mitchell does not want that gun in his house.
Phil refused the gun. Ronnie wanted him to throw it in the canal,and he refused. He told her to take the cash, and indicated that she should "take that with you", meaning the gun. Then Dennis came in and Phil took him upstairs to see Sharon, at which point Ronnie left the gun in the bag on the chair at the table.
There is no way Phil would have left the house, knowing a gun was left where it was, in a bag at the kitchen table. A child was in the house. Had Phil agreed to keep that gun, he'd have taken it from Ronnie, concealed it from Dennis and put it in the wall safe he has in the house. What if, instead of Sharon, Dennis had come to the kitchen and found that?
Ronnie's reckoning behind having the gun was as protection against the Whites. But Ronnie's as big a liar as Phil. If the Whites are her major concern, then Phil would doubly want nothing to do with a gun that's obviously illegal. Ronnie left that gun at Phil's, unbeknownst to Phil, for the same reason she left Carl White's phone there. Interesting that Sharon should find them both.
That gun is the weapon with which Ronnie killed Lucy Beale.
Robbing Peter to Pay Paul.
Once again, a Shirley-centric episode, with her at her worst, achieving the nadir by actually stealing from her son. That's right, she stole from Dean - or attempted to do so - in order to protect her perfect Mick.
Shirl could blackmail with the best of them, especially when it comes to blackmailing Phil.
I wonder if she regrets not shopping him to the police for perverting the course of justice when he was harbouring Ben, in the wake of that reveal. It's interesting to see Shirley get a taste of her medicine, for all she reckoned Phil loved her and wouldn't put her through the same trauma as Sharon. Guess again. Don't ever forget, Shirley, that this is the man who said he could never be faithful to you.
Shirley is such a self-pitying coward. It's foolish to think of her now as a strong or even a brave woman. She's a bully (and most of them are cowards) and she's a drunk. It's actually got to the point now where her Court Jester of a sister is imploring her not to be drunk.
Once again, she betrays Dean. Dean was the only one of her children seven years ago, who actually attempted to bond with her, to call her "mum" and want to love her as a son loves a mother, and time and again, she binned him off - for a Polish builder, for Heather, for whatever. The scene at the Salon where Shirley told Dean how proud she was of him was poignant and honest, and both Linda Henry and Matt di Angelo played blinders there. This was a chance for them to bond again, but the moment she clocked the dosh he put into the cashbox, you knew what she was going to do.
Shirley has a miniscule share in the pub, but she must take a wage, and I'll bet Mick doesn't pay her minimum wage as her name's above the door. She pays no rent, and doesn't contribute to the upkeep of housekeeping, she isn't responsible for overheads at the pub, she has no car. I can only assume that the bulk of her earnings goes on fags and booze. A grand isn't small change, but it's not impossible to get. Still, it's good to know that Shirley now realises that Phil treats every woman he's with or been with equally - like shit.
And now Dean knows that the only way his business got off the ground was via a loan fronted by Phil Mitchell.
Every Good Boy Deserves Favour.
Lies, lies and more lies. Tina is one of the most feckless and irresponsible people I've seen in the show. The way she shirks responsibility is alarming. Run, Tosh! It's no surprise when Tina says her daughter despises her. I'd despise her too. She lies to Ian about doing a shift at the cafe because it's more fun "helping" Dean serve drinks at his opening. Then she lies to her partner about having asked Ian for a rise, right when Ian walks into the pub and sees her there. Yes, run, Tosh. Surely, Tosh must know now that Tina is dishonest and will lie at the drop of a hat. After all, if you don't have honesty in a marriage, says Linda Carter ....
Speaking of whom, Linda went too far, and so did Johnny. Actually, you actually hear of parents approaching their children's tutors after bad exam results. Johnny admitted yesterday that his failures were down to himself. Actually, how anyone can revise or do academic work in that environment is beyond me - sitting in the kitchen with all the distracting hubbub and his mother gazing intently over him. Then he moves to the bar and the actual body of the pub, itself. He must have amazing levels of concentration to blank out all the distraction around him, but obviously, he didn't because he failed a couple of modules. But Linda's ethos is based on ignorance and fear; she summed herself and her type up precisely when she told the tutor that I might not be educated but I ain't stupid. That's belligerance in the face of knowledge and knowledge is power. Maybe that, coupled with the fact that Johnny was a premature baby, is the reason Linda wants to keep her youngest in a puerile and childish mode, when it's really she who sometimes acts the child.
Linda was a child when she married and a child when she had all three of her children. She's never known a real adolescence. She's gone from child to wife with nothing inbetween. Her children are now more mature, in many ways, than she. I was pleased that Mick stopped Johnny when he went too far by referring to his mother to her face as "that stupid bitch." Out of order. Well out of order. Yet, even after coming out, Johnny told people like Whitney and Nancy that he liked living with his parents and was close to his mum. Ironic that, when Nancy ordered him two drinks at Dean's opening, he tagged her an enabler, when it's been convenient for him to enable his mother's behaviour.
Still, this has established Linda's insecurities even moreso.
And speaking of insecurities, the penny's dropping with Sharon too now. She's clocked Phil in a lie about that gun, after Phil having promised honesty to her months ago. If he lied to her about this gun, I'll bet her memory's kicking in and she's beginning to wonder if the attack on The Albert was really coincidental. Whatever is running through her mind in that final scene, it wasn't about using the gun for protection. The gun will get used. It will get fired, but not in the way any of us thinks.
She Dreamed a Dream (That's about to Become a Nightmare)
Sharon Marshall always gives her best. In Friday's episode, we further learned that Stan wasn't the ogre Shirley Queen of Scrotes and her Crown Prince of Moobs, Mick, depicted him. We also learned that Danny Dyer, an actor thought of as a sex symbol, is hairy, simian, fat and has man boobs.
Linda is absolutely one of the best characters to be introduced since Kat Slater - certainly, since Max Branning. Sharon Marshall writes a good episode, but sometimes I felt that her dialogue was beginning to get a bit maudlin in places, and as poignant as it was, the story around why Linda was refusing to "let go" of Johnny and the name she gave him, was a bit contrived.
But I suppose that makes better drama than the obvious truth - that Johnny was a premature baby and the youngest child, and mothers often cling the hardest and the longest to the baby. It's the Empty Nest Syndrome.
So Mick and Linda have been parents since they were fifteen, had three kids before they were twenty - they went from childhood to parenthood with no thought of adolescence inbetween. Yes, I can understand that Mick would have wanted a family, but since they managed to live with Linda's mother for the better part of their married life, it's as though they were children in a family situation deferring to an adult. We've heard so much about Elaine, Linda's mother, and how she rolls her eyes every time Elaine would phone to offer advice, isn't this a direct parallel between Linda and Elaine and Johnny and Linda?
And even though Linda was at pains to say that she didn't trap Mick into marriage, that he wanted a family at fifteen, when he was still a child, I'm wondering that if their alliance is borne out of something mistaken for love, but what is, in reality, a fear of anything different or comfort with the familiar. A lot of Linda's ignorance is based on fear; a lot of Mick's is based on resignation.
You know, we see the same sort of set-up with Bianca and Carol, where Carol assumes the ultimate role of overall parent, and Bianca becomes one of the children. The Vic was Mick's and Linda's chance to stand on their own two feet, and now they get the added "bonus" of the presence of Shirley, his sister who's really his mother and who - if the writers and the retconning are to be believed - found sufficient time between seriously courting and getting pregnant by Kevin and marrying him to be the sort of maternal figure Mick adores. And it's Shirley who calls the shots. I really wanted Linda, or at least, Nancy, to smack her silly tonight when she made that bitterly cruel remark about Linda giving parental advice when, according to Shirley, her kids all hate her. Because Shirley is such a f*cking perfect parent. Not.
Linda may be over-protective and controlling, but she loves her children, and she's a better parent by miles than Shirley would ever be. At least, Linda doesn't lose her rag and try to kill her kids. That's how brutally simplistic Shirley is - because there's a difference of opinion between Linda and her children, Shirley gleefully snatches this as hatred. No, Shirley, Linda's children don't hate her, but yours hate you. Because Dean didn't repay that money to Phil to get you off the hook; he did it because he knew that Phil's money was a debt ultimately down to his profits, because that's the only way that would get paid.
Shirley "celebrates" Dean breaking into the house of a man, whose fiancée had just gone through an horrific attack by intruders, which left her seriously injured, by stealing champagne from her brother's pub - Mick won't miss one bottle of champagne - and invites Dean to stop by the pub later and she'd filch some more drinks. Tell me, does she steal her cigarettes too? This woman gets free room and board out of the goodness of her brother's (son's) heart, a job, a stake in the business, and she's still stealing from him. As is her feckless court jester of a sister. (Aside: I laughed out loud at the name of Linda's parents' pub - the Jester. Do you think that influenced the insipid Tina's subsequent behaviour?)
It's quite amusing and deserving to see Shirley literally piss herself in fright when Phil merely mentions whispering a word in Mick's shell-like. Loved the scene where he turned around and shouted Miiiick!!!!. Shirley can dish out the hardarse attitude and blackmail threats, but she can't take it. And, thus, Phil goes from getting a grand a month from Alfie to getting a grand a week from Dean.
It goes without saying that the scene of the night was that between Timothy West and Kellie Bright, but I thought it was wrong of the family to push the blame of this entire situation on Linda and expect her to apologise. Yes, she was certainly wrong; and, yes, Johnny has to grow up and wants to grow up - but Johnny's growing up on his own terms. He's quite happy to act the baby, with Linda running after him on early morning breakfast runs, when it suits him, but this sort of behaviour enables her own reactions. She apologised and ultimately wished her son well on the pull, hoping he found someone nice; but I didn't hear Johnny apologise for calling Linda a bitch - sorry, a stupid bitch anymore than to acknowledge that it was wrong.
As much as Linda knows her son, so he should know and be a bit more understanding of her. Because of her background and lifestyle choices, Linda is ignorant, fears change, conservative in outlook and afraid of knowledge and anyone with knowledge. Johnny's getting an education, which is knowledge and with knowledge, comes power. Maybe she's afraid of the shift in dynamic. Linda's been a wife and mother since she was fifteen years old. She's known nothing else. She's probably very disapproving and, at the same time, very envious of women who've forged a career or got an education and moved forward. She's never been with anyone but Mick and she believes she never wanted to be otherwise.
People are uneasy with the final scene - the hug between Dean and Linda - entirely maternal on her part, but something more on his. Rightly so. This is a redux, with a variation, on Sean and Tanya. (No greatest hits except your own, eh, Dom?) For everyone thinking and praying that Mick and Linda aren't torn apart by an affair, consider the previous landlords of the Vic:
Anyway, for the second week running, we've had a gaggle of good episodes. Whereas last week featured Sharon, or rather DTC's muse of scrotes, Shirley acting out, this week featured her even more, and she should be having an epiphany about Phil, but her wrinkled, old booze-flattened, cigarette-stinking skin is too thick and her entitlement is too great for her to even fathom that.
Secrets and Lies: The Ice Queen Goeth.
For the record, pregnant or not, I still think Ronnie killed Lucy. I still think Not-Charlie Cotton had something to do with it as well.
Let me also say, as well, that, since the Carters figured heavily in this week's episodes, I've never seen a more immature lot of adults in my life. The Mitchells are certainly dysfunctional, as are the Beales and the Brannings; but the Carters occupy an unusual situation, wherein the children of the family are, at times, more mature than their adult counterparts. There's a reason for this.
Shirley is certainly exemplary of such puerility. Her reaction to Phil's engagement to Sharon is to get stonking drunk, spend a night on a bench and then whine pathetically to - of all people - Roxy and Ronnie, the Retcon Sisters.
In fact, Ronnie ...
Really, Roswell?
Of course, Ronnie would think that Shirley was "the one" for Phil, for obvious reasons, and that remark and it's non-history (for lack of a better term) was the only niggle of this episode. Why? Because Ronnie Retcon would only have known Phil in a relationship with Shirley, but then before anyone starts jumping up and down about the use of the word retcon, the Mitchell sisters are. For years, prior to 2007, it was an established fact that Eric, Phil's father, had one brother, Clive. There was no mention ever of another brother or any cousins, other than Billy, whose father was Eric's first cousin. Billy bears the same relation to Phil that Michael Moon bore to Alfie.
Then, suddenly, we're presented with two Mitchell sisters, daughters of a Mitchell uncle, Archie, of whom we'd never heard, arrive at a non-wedding where they're not immediately recognised at all. They made, from time to time, vague references to incidences that happened when they were small children and the Bruvs were ages older, but they don't seem to be familiar any of the Mitchell lore that would have been common knowledge in a family like that -such as Sharongate. That was and certainly would have been big potatoes amongst the Mitchells.
Ronnie thought Shirley suited Phil the best? She may not have approved of Sharon because of the Sharongate saga, but surely she knows about Kathy? Kate?
Besides, how can she surmise that Shirley and Phil were the ultimate couple when Shirley encouraged and brought out the absolute worst in Phil? But then, Ronnie, at this point, is beyond redemption, herself.
However, in the course of this grand whine of poor pitiful Shirley's, she accidentally on purpose lets drop to Ronnie that Phil doesn't love Sharon. No, he doesn't, reckons Shirley. Shirley is absolutely certain that Phil doesn't love Sharon. In fact, he's only marrying her because he feels sorry for her ... because Phil organised the thugs to go into The Albert and beat Sharon up.
Well, no, actually, he didn't. But what's the truth to a scrote like Shirley? What Phil did was what the Mitchells always do. They organise a bit of terror tactic, with someone on hand to save the day, and then it goes wrong. The thugs were meant to scare Sharon and she was meant to be rescued by the bouncers she'd sent home. Phil never intended for Sharon to be physically hurt; things just got out of hand. It goes without saying, however, that what he meant to do originally, is just as despicable and psychologically intimidating.
Kudos to Ronnie for later pointing that out to Phil, that his male ego, his Mitchell ego was so much that he had to reduce an independent woman to a blubbing, gibbering wreck. Phil has known Sharon for twenty years. He should know her better, and for all scrote-faced Shirley boasts about knowing Phil better than anyone after a mere seven years of skulking around in his shadow, encouraging him to do bad, she should know better as well.
So now the headcount of who knows Phil's secret stands at Phil, Shirley and Ronnie. I'll bet, after she banged on his door, with Sharon upstairs, shoutiing the odds, that Phil regrets ever confiding in her.
Of couse, all this action in Monday's episode was played out against the revelation that Ronnie Retcon is pregnant. Again.
The fanbois are creaming their briefs over this one, jumping up and down agog and insisting that Ronnie is going to get a happy ending, with the baby she wants and with Charlie Cotton.
Guys, grow up. And get some balls. Seriously.
Ronnie is a psychopath. She's killed a man. She's probably killed Lucy. With the gun she so conveniently left at Phil's. Of course, she didn't shoot Lucy. There's more than one way you can kill with a gun. And Charlie Cotton isn't Charlie Cotton. In fact, we don't know who he is. But she is not going to get a happy ending, not by a long shot. In fact, I've revised my opinion that Ronnie might die. Having her die in childbirth would be one massive cop-out. She's killed a man, and if she killed Lucy, she'll be locked up for life - not five years or five months. This will be the storyline to illustrate the current law that's in force for murderers where life does actually mean life. So Ronnie probably will have a baby, but won't be able to be with that child because she'll be in prison.
And by the way, fanbois, it is possible to have sex, conceive a child and kill a person all in a night's work. I never knew there were so many virgins, especially male fanboi virgins, in the whole of the UK who now reckon that just because Ronnie and Charlie copulated on Good Friday, releases her as a suspect in Lucy's death. It doesn't. Her lack of presence enhances the suspicion.
Now stop wanking and go find a boy or girl to help you pop that cherry.
There were certainly a plethora of home truths tonight, none the least being that neither Phil nor Ronnie know what love is. I've no doubt that Phil loves Sharon, but he knows that Sharon not only knows his history, she's a part of it. She was the one he blamed, conveniently, for Sharongate. He stood by whilst his brother called her a whore, offered her about to his friends; he would be aware that Sharon knows the Mitchell form for proving a point and for insisting that they be the centre of the universe for every woman with whom they have a relationship. Sooner or later, Sharon's going to suss what Phil did, and it may not take Shirley to tell her. He also knows, deep down, that whilst he may love her, Sharon isn't in love with him. She's fond of him, but just let Grant pay a visit to Walford, and we'll see whom Sharon really loves.
The Mitchells really are toxic, especially so, without Peggy about to anchor them, and I was glad Phil refused to let Ronnie take the moral high ground, because she's done far worse, in cold-blooded murder, than Phil. Really, both of them need a comeuppance.
And please don't delude yourself about Ronnie's departure. She's not gone for good - in fact, she'll be back at the end of the summer, when the actress has finished filming Pleasant Valley. Ronnie just can't keep away from her control fetish and sexual obsession - Roxy - so she'll come back. What you saw on Monday was a psychopath losing her all-important control and retreating in order to regain it.
As for Shirley, how self-obsessed and pathetic! Who is she to know whom Phil loves and whom he doesn't? She's basing a lot of her assumptions on kindness and concern that he showed her after her declaration of love. She thinks that no one would put someone they love in harm's way the way Phil did Sharon? Then she doesn't know the Mitchells. No one loved Sharon more than Grant, yet he almost had her burned alive. Shirley loves the power Phil gives her by validating her as an important person in Walford. Without Phil, Shirley's just a drunk on a bench. Dean certainly knows. The best scene by far tonight was when Phil turned the tables on the old scrote and gave her a taste of her own blackmailing methods. She's got the secret about Phil and the Albert, but Phil knows that Mick is her son. And Sharon knows about Phil's and Shirley's involvement in covering Ronnie's murderous tracks.
Poor, self-pitying Shirl! Hits the bottle when things don't go her way. What a vile and disgusting character.
So Phil turns tricks on Shirley and demands her repayment of his loan of 10K or else, he'll tell her perfect Mick the truth about himself. Good to know that Shirl can dish it out, but she can't take it.
As for Sharon finding the gun, the woman is thinking.
Mr Pleasant, AKA Mick Carter.
Notice the coldness that now exists between Mick and Linda, as well as Mick's ill-concealed jealousy of Dean? Johnny's failed some of his exams. Are we surprised? Linda is quick to blame his tutors and everything else, but in the end, Johnny's right. He's only got himself to blame. He seemed to be spending a lot of hours working at the Vic, socialising with the local youngsters, having illegal parties at the Albert etc, and we rarely saw him studying or even referencing uni. This is pretty realistic, I would think. I hope he does re-sits and carries on, because further education doesn't sit high on EastEnders' scale of things. At least, not since Michelle Fowler got her degree.
It seems that everyone is taking an emotional punch at Linda, who can do nothing right - whether it's pampering her children or masking her disappointment that her child failed his exams. Mick is treating her now like a bastard at a family reunion, but Dean is very subtle in being nice to her.
Johnny, himself, annoyed me to no end in this episode, because as much as he might bleat on about wanting to grow up, when it suits him, he wants to be babied and mollycoddled by his mother. After all, Johnny readily admitted that he didn't go into halls his first year, because he wanted to live with his parents. In fact, for a university student, he spends curiously little time at uni. He doesn't participate in any fora or activities there, he has no friends. All his studying is done in the upstairs kitchen or at the bar or in the pub, itself. Are we suprised that he failed? Does he miss his parents so much he couldn't avail himself of the university library?
One final comment before I move to Tuesday's episode: Without a shadow of a doubt, Phil refused to take the gun Ronnie had. There's an ongoing discussion about this, wherein one participant refuses to yield to the obvious and admit a proven fact: Phil Mitchell does not want that gun in his house.
Phil refused the gun. Ronnie wanted him to throw it in the canal,and he refused. He told her to take the cash, and indicated that she should "take that with you", meaning the gun. Then Dennis came in and Phil took him upstairs to see Sharon, at which point Ronnie left the gun in the bag on the chair at the table.
There is no way Phil would have left the house, knowing a gun was left where it was, in a bag at the kitchen table. A child was in the house. Had Phil agreed to keep that gun, he'd have taken it from Ronnie, concealed it from Dennis and put it in the wall safe he has in the house. What if, instead of Sharon, Dennis had come to the kitchen and found that?
Ronnie's reckoning behind having the gun was as protection against the Whites. But Ronnie's as big a liar as Phil. If the Whites are her major concern, then Phil would doubly want nothing to do with a gun that's obviously illegal. Ronnie left that gun at Phil's, unbeknownst to Phil, for the same reason she left Carl White's phone there. Interesting that Sharon should find them both.
That gun is the weapon with which Ronnie killed Lucy Beale.
Robbing Peter to Pay Paul.
Once again, a Shirley-centric episode, with her at her worst, achieving the nadir by actually stealing from her son. That's right, she stole from Dean - or attempted to do so - in order to protect her perfect Mick.
Shirl could blackmail with the best of them, especially when it comes to blackmailing Phil.
I wonder if she regrets not shopping him to the police for perverting the course of justice when he was harbouring Ben, in the wake of that reveal. It's interesting to see Shirley get a taste of her medicine, for all she reckoned Phil loved her and wouldn't put her through the same trauma as Sharon. Guess again. Don't ever forget, Shirley, that this is the man who said he could never be faithful to you.
Shirley is such a self-pitying coward. It's foolish to think of her now as a strong or even a brave woman. She's a bully (and most of them are cowards) and she's a drunk. It's actually got to the point now where her Court Jester of a sister is imploring her not to be drunk.
Once again, she betrays Dean. Dean was the only one of her children seven years ago, who actually attempted to bond with her, to call her "mum" and want to love her as a son loves a mother, and time and again, she binned him off - for a Polish builder, for Heather, for whatever. The scene at the Salon where Shirley told Dean how proud she was of him was poignant and honest, and both Linda Henry and Matt di Angelo played blinders there. This was a chance for them to bond again, but the moment she clocked the dosh he put into the cashbox, you knew what she was going to do.
Shirley has a miniscule share in the pub, but she must take a wage, and I'll bet Mick doesn't pay her minimum wage as her name's above the door. She pays no rent, and doesn't contribute to the upkeep of housekeeping, she isn't responsible for overheads at the pub, she has no car. I can only assume that the bulk of her earnings goes on fags and booze. A grand isn't small change, but it's not impossible to get. Still, it's good to know that Shirley now realises that Phil treats every woman he's with or been with equally - like shit.
And now Dean knows that the only way his business got off the ground was via a loan fronted by Phil Mitchell.
Every Good Boy Deserves Favour.
Lies, lies and more lies. Tina is one of the most feckless and irresponsible people I've seen in the show. The way she shirks responsibility is alarming. Run, Tosh! It's no surprise when Tina says her daughter despises her. I'd despise her too. She lies to Ian about doing a shift at the cafe because it's more fun "helping" Dean serve drinks at his opening. Then she lies to her partner about having asked Ian for a rise, right when Ian walks into the pub and sees her there. Yes, run, Tosh. Surely, Tosh must know now that Tina is dishonest and will lie at the drop of a hat. After all, if you don't have honesty in a marriage, says Linda Carter ....
Speaking of whom, Linda went too far, and so did Johnny. Actually, you actually hear of parents approaching their children's tutors after bad exam results. Johnny admitted yesterday that his failures were down to himself. Actually, how anyone can revise or do academic work in that environment is beyond me - sitting in the kitchen with all the distracting hubbub and his mother gazing intently over him. Then he moves to the bar and the actual body of the pub, itself. He must have amazing levels of concentration to blank out all the distraction around him, but obviously, he didn't because he failed a couple of modules. But Linda's ethos is based on ignorance and fear; she summed herself and her type up precisely when she told the tutor that I might not be educated but I ain't stupid. That's belligerance in the face of knowledge and knowledge is power. Maybe that, coupled with the fact that Johnny was a premature baby, is the reason Linda wants to keep her youngest in a puerile and childish mode, when it's really she who sometimes acts the child.
Linda was a child when she married and a child when she had all three of her children. She's never known a real adolescence. She's gone from child to wife with nothing inbetween. Her children are now more mature, in many ways, than she. I was pleased that Mick stopped Johnny when he went too far by referring to his mother to her face as "that stupid bitch." Out of order. Well out of order. Yet, even after coming out, Johnny told people like Whitney and Nancy that he liked living with his parents and was close to his mum. Ironic that, when Nancy ordered him two drinks at Dean's opening, he tagged her an enabler, when it's been convenient for him to enable his mother's behaviour.
Still, this has established Linda's insecurities even moreso.
And speaking of insecurities, the penny's dropping with Sharon too now. She's clocked Phil in a lie about that gun, after Phil having promised honesty to her months ago. If he lied to her about this gun, I'll bet her memory's kicking in and she's beginning to wonder if the attack on The Albert was really coincidental. Whatever is running through her mind in that final scene, it wasn't about using the gun for protection. The gun will get used. It will get fired, but not in the way any of us thinks.
She Dreamed a Dream (That's about to Become a Nightmare)
Sharon Marshall always gives her best. In Friday's episode, we further learned that Stan wasn't the ogre Shirley Queen of Scrotes and her Crown Prince of Moobs, Mick, depicted him. We also learned that Danny Dyer, an actor thought of as a sex symbol, is hairy, simian, fat and has man boobs.
Linda is absolutely one of the best characters to be introduced since Kat Slater - certainly, since Max Branning. Sharon Marshall writes a good episode, but sometimes I felt that her dialogue was beginning to get a bit maudlin in places, and as poignant as it was, the story around why Linda was refusing to "let go" of Johnny and the name she gave him, was a bit contrived.
But I suppose that makes better drama than the obvious truth - that Johnny was a premature baby and the youngest child, and mothers often cling the hardest and the longest to the baby. It's the Empty Nest Syndrome.
So Mick and Linda have been parents since they were fifteen, had three kids before they were twenty - they went from childhood to parenthood with no thought of adolescence inbetween. Yes, I can understand that Mick would have wanted a family, but since they managed to live with Linda's mother for the better part of their married life, it's as though they were children in a family situation deferring to an adult. We've heard so much about Elaine, Linda's mother, and how she rolls her eyes every time Elaine would phone to offer advice, isn't this a direct parallel between Linda and Elaine and Johnny and Linda?
And even though Linda was at pains to say that she didn't trap Mick into marriage, that he wanted a family at fifteen, when he was still a child, I'm wondering that if their alliance is borne out of something mistaken for love, but what is, in reality, a fear of anything different or comfort with the familiar. A lot of Linda's ignorance is based on fear; a lot of Mick's is based on resignation.
You know, we see the same sort of set-up with Bianca and Carol, where Carol assumes the ultimate role of overall parent, and Bianca becomes one of the children. The Vic was Mick's and Linda's chance to stand on their own two feet, and now they get the added "bonus" of the presence of Shirley, his sister who's really his mother and who - if the writers and the retconning are to be believed - found sufficient time between seriously courting and getting pregnant by Kevin and marrying him to be the sort of maternal figure Mick adores. And it's Shirley who calls the shots. I really wanted Linda, or at least, Nancy, to smack her silly tonight when she made that bitterly cruel remark about Linda giving parental advice when, according to Shirley, her kids all hate her. Because Shirley is such a f*cking perfect parent. Not.
Linda may be over-protective and controlling, but she loves her children, and she's a better parent by miles than Shirley would ever be. At least, Linda doesn't lose her rag and try to kill her kids. That's how brutally simplistic Shirley is - because there's a difference of opinion between Linda and her children, Shirley gleefully snatches this as hatred. No, Shirley, Linda's children don't hate her, but yours hate you. Because Dean didn't repay that money to Phil to get you off the hook; he did it because he knew that Phil's money was a debt ultimately down to his profits, because that's the only way that would get paid.
Shirley "celebrates" Dean breaking into the house of a man, whose fiancée had just gone through an horrific attack by intruders, which left her seriously injured, by stealing champagne from her brother's pub - Mick won't miss one bottle of champagne - and invites Dean to stop by the pub later and she'd filch some more drinks. Tell me, does she steal her cigarettes too? This woman gets free room and board out of the goodness of her brother's (son's) heart, a job, a stake in the business, and she's still stealing from him. As is her feckless court jester of a sister. (Aside: I laughed out loud at the name of Linda's parents' pub - the Jester. Do you think that influenced the insipid Tina's subsequent behaviour?)
It's quite amusing and deserving to see Shirley literally piss herself in fright when Phil merely mentions whispering a word in Mick's shell-like. Loved the scene where he turned around and shouted Miiiick!!!!. Shirley can dish out the hardarse attitude and blackmail threats, but she can't take it. And, thus, Phil goes from getting a grand a month from Alfie to getting a grand a week from Dean.
It goes without saying that the scene of the night was that between Timothy West and Kellie Bright, but I thought it was wrong of the family to push the blame of this entire situation on Linda and expect her to apologise. Yes, she was certainly wrong; and, yes, Johnny has to grow up and wants to grow up - but Johnny's growing up on his own terms. He's quite happy to act the baby, with Linda running after him on early morning breakfast runs, when it suits him, but this sort of behaviour enables her own reactions. She apologised and ultimately wished her son well on the pull, hoping he found someone nice; but I didn't hear Johnny apologise for calling Linda a bitch - sorry, a stupid bitch anymore than to acknowledge that it was wrong.
As much as Linda knows her son, so he should know and be a bit more understanding of her. Because of her background and lifestyle choices, Linda is ignorant, fears change, conservative in outlook and afraid of knowledge and anyone with knowledge. Johnny's getting an education, which is knowledge and with knowledge, comes power. Maybe she's afraid of the shift in dynamic. Linda's been a wife and mother since she was fifteen years old. She's known nothing else. She's probably very disapproving and, at the same time, very envious of women who've forged a career or got an education and moved forward. She's never been with anyone but Mick and she believes she never wanted to be otherwise.
People are uneasy with the final scene - the hug between Dean and Linda - entirely maternal on her part, but something more on his. Rightly so. This is a redux, with a variation, on Sean and Tanya. (No greatest hits except your own, eh, Dom?) For everyone thinking and praying that Mick and Linda aren't torn apart by an affair, consider the previous landlords of the Vic:
- Den and Angie - ripped apart by alcoholism and infidelity
- Grant and Sharon - ripped apart by domestic violence and infidelity
- Peggy and Frank - ripped apart by financial fraud and infidelity
- Alfie and Kat - ripped apart by emotional abuse and infidelity
Spot the common thread. Why should the Carters be any different?
A final thought: When Sharon is properly awake, she's going to wonder why Dean Wicks broke into her bedroom and threw money at Phil.
"Apologies for another weekly summary,
ReplyDeletethe World Cup is still on
(some of us have teams who are still in the competition)"
& how unlucky you guys were (I'm right that you're from the states ?) it was the game of the competition & the US taught many 'so called' footballing nations how to actually play the game - & that includes the country that invented the game - England.
Several of my footy loving mates were surprised that I chose America as my 2nd team after England were knocked out.
But hey, they also laughed at me when I bet them that England would get knocked out in the first round while they had bets at the bookies on England WINNING the world cup lol.
I don't blame them for getting sucked into believing the hype - I purposely have up reading the 'red tops' just before the last WC & it was like a wake up call.
"Phil refused the gun. Ronnie wanted him to throw it in the canal,and he refused. He told her to take the cash, and indicated that she should "take that with you", meaning the gun. Then Dennis came in and Phil took him upstairs to see Sharon, at which point Ronnie left the gun in the bag on the chair at the table."
ReplyDeleteFunny how we interpret things in different ways. The way I saw it was Phil referring to the money when he said "take that with you" after Ronnie had initially refused the cash.
Also Phil didn't pass the bag over to Ronnie as she left - he said nothing & placed the bag on the chair & walked out the room.
In my mind Phil accepted the gun - let's not forget that he's no shrinking violet & if he refused the gun/bag there's no way he would let Ronnie walk away WITHOUT it.
Anyhow - this is what makes us human - we all have our own opinions.
Ps Another entitled piece of behavior from Ronnie - get rid of the fucking gun yourself you lazy cow ! Is it that difficult to dump it in the Thames - not after getting hold of a gun in the first place - let's face facts - there's no way she would be able to get one.
Pps The ending scene with Sharon 'cuddling' the gun ! WTF ?