Here she goes again ... the last time, remember, she was advocating vandalism. Now, in a desperate attempt to appear relevant and to curry favour with her pathetic flying monkey, Moaning Lisa, she elevates Shirley to the pedestal of assessor of good parenting techniques, whilst simultaneously, condemning another child to the vagaries of the state care system, something which ruined the child's mother.
Vald
says:-
Ho boy ... and how, exactly, did Ben repay Shirley's love? Yes, he killed her best friend. And Shirley is in no position to judge whether or not Phil should "get his hands on another child."
This is the same Shirley, remember, who walked out on her own three children, all under six years of age, one disabled. This is the same Shirley who spent the next twenty years mothering her deficiente friend, Heather, when she wasn't abandoning Heather to her own cruel mother in order to run off with whatever man-of-the-moment she fancied. This is the same Shirley, who left a single mother and child homeless on a park bench, and robbed from another single mother.
Yes, Shirley's in such a great position to judge, especially advocating a child be put back into care rather than placed with her family - purely out of jealous spite.
Reading that, one hopes vald never got her hands sufficiently on any child. Come to think of it, the prisons are pretty overflowing right now, so I guess she did ...
As the sage commentator Scrabbler rightlyhands her her trolling ass responds:-
Touche'.
I think this calls for a chorus of The Troll Song. I hope people hear this in their heads every time they read an insipid, pandering and totally idiotic comment from vald ...
Update: vald
accuses Phil Mitchell of being a bully. Perhaps she should address her own passive-aggressive tendencies, so prevalent in her commentary. And lay off the booze, herself.
Vald
Shirley loved Ben and witnessed how Phil reduced him to a wreck several times. We know that Phil should not get his hands on another child and so does Shirley.
TBH I'd rather that baby was kept in care than go to Phil if Lola is not going to get her back. He is not fit to care for a child.
Ho boy ... and how, exactly, did Ben repay Shirley's love? Yes, he killed her best friend. And Shirley is in no position to judge whether or not Phil should "get his hands on another child."
This is the same Shirley, remember, who walked out on her own three children, all under six years of age, one disabled. This is the same Shirley who spent the next twenty years mothering her deficiente friend, Heather, when she wasn't abandoning Heather to her own cruel mother in order to run off with whatever man-of-the-moment she fancied. This is the same Shirley, who left a single mother and child homeless on a park bench, and robbed from another single mother.
Yes, Shirley's in such a great position to judge, especially advocating a child be put back into care rather than placed with her family - purely out of jealous spite.
Reading that, one hopes vald never got her hands sufficiently on any child. Come to think of it, the prisons are pretty overflowing right now, so I guess she did ...
As the sage commentator Scrabbler rightly
Shirley certainly cannot take it in her own hands as to whether she thinks Phil is a good parent. She'd be a hypocrite if she did that.
Touche'.
I think this calls for a chorus of The Troll Song. I hope people hear this in their heads every time they read an insipid, pandering and totally idiotic comment from vald ...
Update: vald
accuses Phil Mitchell of being a bully. Perhaps she should address her own passive-aggressive tendencies, so prevalent in her commentary. And lay off the booze, herself.
No comments:
Post a Comment