Have a look here for a real example of passive-aggressive bullying, courtesy of the amorphous Bex (who is either the man pretending to be a girl or the girl who'se writing style is aggressive in the most masculine sense).
Defending him/her/it to the hilt, of course, is Nurse Ratchit. Something to be said for a woman who enjoys a bully session. She might think she's a ball-breaker, but really that's a sad form of penis envy mingled with abject bitchiness.
The administrator of that site really should do something about the bullying on there, as well as banned members coming back under assumed names as in Biffo/Blossom now being Peege/Penn. Same Scottish IP, I'll bet you.
Oh well, one rule for one, one for another in John's private universe.
UPDATE: People who are passive-aggressive bullies are often very adept at playing the victim card - that's part of the passive-aggressive technique. To the androgynous Bex, your manner is subtly aggressive; it's enough that one commentator on Walford Web has openly declared he doesn't post as much because of you and your good-cop-bad-cop cohorts.
As for Ratchit, it's rich she calls what goes on on that forum mere discussion, when she has been part and parcel of some of the most underhanded and undermining attempts at subtle bullying, herself. She thinks mud doesn't stick and her shit doesn't smell - she's wrong. The stench is unbearable.
It's funny to think that I was always deemed the bully when I posted on that cesspit full of various bully types. I've long gone, but the bullying continues. Truth is, anyone who disagrees with the chosen few currently in a perceived hierarchy is bullied out. Looks to me as if the remaining forum hosts and those frequentbullies commentators called "contributors" are the biggest proponents.
UPDATE: The bloody point is, Ratchit, that you, yourself lured me into posting on that cesspit and then started to whine when you weren't front and centre as a poster anymore. You play nice to people and then stab them in the back. You're adept at working behind the scenes to malign certain commentators who have a different point of view or who are able to grasp the little bit of nuance left in the show, which you aren't. It really doesn't matter, because passive-aggressive bullies are sociopathically successful enough to play the victim to people they've snookered, just like you, Ms/Mr Bex and a couple of others have managed to snooker John-I-Just-Want-a-Peaceful-Life-Swallow into believing you're the good folk and every other bastard who disagrees with your point of view is the one who's causing the trouble. Believe me, Jay Lee isn't the problem, you are.
UPDATE: The androgynous Bex says:-
Besides all that, bullyboi Bex needs to get a grip on a moral perspective. Jack was not Tanya's partner (and the janus that is Nebraska needs to realise this too). Tanya entertained an entirely adulterous relationship with Jack for one whole year. A year in which her husband lived within the same community and a year when she denied him access to his children and even plotted with Jack to leave the country with the children, a totally illegal act. Jack even went as far as beating Max to a pulp, threatening to kill him and telling him he'd never see his children again.
So much for Jack's undying devotion to Tanya. Within weeks of that scene, he was sleeping with Ronnie and about to be discovered as Amy's father.
Jack's a whore, and so is Tanya; and so, regrettably, have the writers made Sharon this time around - all in a pathetic effort to remake her into Tanya Mach II.
(Pssst ... message to Mr Bex: Janine and Michael are the parents of Scarlett, whose uncle, I believe, is Tyler Moon.)
Defending him/her/it to the hilt, of course, is Nurse Ratchit. Something to be said for a woman who enjoys a bully session. She might think she's a ball-breaker, but really that's a sad form of penis envy mingled with abject bitchiness.
The administrator of that site really should do something about the bullying on there, as well as banned members coming back under assumed names as in Biffo/Blossom now being Peege/Penn. Same Scottish IP, I'll bet you.
Oh well, one rule for one, one for another in John's private universe.
UPDATE: People who are passive-aggressive bullies are often very adept at playing the victim card - that's part of the passive-aggressive technique. To the androgynous Bex, your manner is subtly aggressive; it's enough that one commentator on Walford Web has openly declared he doesn't post as much because of you and your good-cop-bad-cop cohorts.
As for Ratchit, it's rich she calls what goes on on that forum mere discussion, when she has been part and parcel of some of the most underhanded and undermining attempts at subtle bullying, herself. She thinks mud doesn't stick and her shit doesn't smell - she's wrong. The stench is unbearable.
It's funny to think that I was always deemed the bully when I posted on that cesspit full of various bully types. I've long gone, but the bullying continues. Truth is, anyone who disagrees with the chosen few currently in a perceived hierarchy is bullied out. Looks to me as if the remaining forum hosts and those frequent
UPDATE: The bloody point is, Ratchit, that you, yourself lured me into posting on that cesspit and then started to whine when you weren't front and centre as a poster anymore. You play nice to people and then stab them in the back. You're adept at working behind the scenes to malign certain commentators who have a different point of view or who are able to grasp the little bit of nuance left in the show, which you aren't. It really doesn't matter, because passive-aggressive bullies are sociopathically successful enough to play the victim to people they've snookered, just like you, Ms/Mr Bex and a couple of others have managed to snooker John-I-Just-Want-a-Peaceful-Life-Swallow into believing you're the good folk and every other bastard who disagrees with your point of view is the one who's causing the trouble. Believe me, Jay Lee isn't the problem, you are.
UPDATE: The androgynous Bex says:-
I think the point being made is that there's no specific bad blood between Tanya and Jack, she's known him a lot longer than Sharon and he's the uncle of her kids. There are lots of relationships/friendships that the show chooses to neglect for a while it doesn't mean they're not still going on in the background, she's seen Jack at family gatherings and has always got on okay with him. To me it makes sense she would side with Jack over Sharon but like Nebraska pointed out she was hardly blackmailing Sharon to do that she would need to gain something from it.Bullyboi is missing something else entirely: It was Jack who recently informed Tanya, in no uncertain terms, that Kirsty was currently Max's wife, and Tanya was, distinctly at this point, not part of the Branning family dynamic, kids or no kids.
Besides all that, bullyboi Bex needs to get a grip on a moral perspective. Jack was not Tanya's partner (and the janus that is Nebraska needs to realise this too). Tanya entertained an entirely adulterous relationship with Jack for one whole year. A year in which her husband lived within the same community and a year when she denied him access to his children and even plotted with Jack to leave the country with the children, a totally illegal act. Jack even went as far as beating Max to a pulp, threatening to kill him and telling him he'd never see his children again.
So much for Jack's undying devotion to Tanya. Within weeks of that scene, he was sleeping with Ronnie and about to be discovered as Amy's father.
Jack's a whore, and so is Tanya; and so, regrettably, have the writers made Sharon this time around - all in a pathetic effort to remake her into Tanya Mach II.
(Pssst ... message to Mr Bex: Janine and Michael are the parents of Scarlett, whose uncle, I believe, is Tyler Moon.)
I stopped posting there because of the bullies. A quick glance shows you the people you named, targetting people for nothing else but a different point of view. Nurse Ratchit how very apt.
ReplyDelete